Archive for January, 2008

Technical Irony

While looking for a URL rewriting tool for a client I found a reference to a tool, clicked the link and got a 404 error.

Posted on:
Posted in Strange Problems | Comments Off on Technical Irony

Defining Project Success

There is an article in Dr. Dobbs that describes a survey performed by the author. The survey was intended to query Project Managers, IT Managers, IT staff and business stakeholders on what defined the success of a project.

There were definitely some interesting findings:

  • The IT industry has a long way to go to achieve a 100% success rate for projects
  • Agile projects were more successful than traditional waterfall projects
  • Off-shored projects were most likely to fail
  • Respondents rated quality as the most important issue, and rated the importance of following items this way when analyzed as a group:

    Quality > Scope > Staff Health > Time of Completion > Money

  • Project managers differed significantly from all other groups in their perception of success, rating time and money over quality.
  • Business stakeholders placed a higher value on ROI and and shipping when ready than the rest of the groups
  • A majority of respondents in all groups worked on projects they knew would fail from the start, but canceling a troubled project was not viewed as a successful outcome

I am not surprised by project managers having a different view, given that they are trained to value on-time and on-budget projects. Someone has to keep an eye on the bottom line, but I have experienced this gap when a project runs into trouble. I have been thinking about the differences between Agile and Waterfall-style projects and how they differ. I think there is some middle ground between the two that is yet to be identified that gives us the benefits of heavier requirements and design and the responsiveness to change.

Posted on:
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Defining Project Success